ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Missing Women Estimation×Gender Inequality Index×
분야Gender StudiesGender Studies
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19902010
창시자Amartya SenUNDP Human Development Report Office (Gaye, Klugman et al.)
유형Demographic accounting estimateComposite inequality index
원전Sen, A. (1992). Missing women. BMJ, 304(6827), 587–588. DOI ↗Gaye, A., Klugman, J., Kovacevic, M., Twigg, S., & Zambrano, E. (2010). Measuring key disparities in human development: The Gender Inequality Index. Human Development Research Paper 2010/46. UNDP Human Development Report Office. link ↗
별칭Missing Women, Excess Female Mortality Estimation, Sen Missing Women MethodGII, UNDP Gender Inequality Index
관련24
요약Missing women estimation quantifies the number of women and girls who are absent from a population because of gender bias in mortality and, in some settings, sex-selective abortion. Introduced by economist Amartya Sen in 1990 and 1992, the method compares the observed female population (or female deaths) with the number expected under a benchmark sex ratio that would prevail absent discrimination. The resulting deficit — famously estimated at more than 100 million worldwide — is a stark demographic measure of cumulative anti-female bias.The Gender Inequality Index (GII) is a composite measure introduced by the UNDP in the 2010 Human Development Report to capture the loss in potential human development due to inequality between women and men. It combines three dimensions — reproductive health, empowerment, and labour-market participation — into a single index ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (complete inequality), using an association-sensitive aggregation that penalises both gaps between the sexes and inequality across dimensions.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Missing Women Estimation · Gender Inequality Index. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare