ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis×Power Transition Analysis×
분야International RelationsInternational Relations
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19961980
창시자Daniel Jones, Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer (Correlates of War project)A. F. K. Organski & Jacek Kugler
유형Coding and statistical analysis of interstate militarized confrontationsTheory-driven observational analysis of war between rising and dominant powers
원전Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213. DOI ↗Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The War Ledger. University of Chicago Press. link ↗
별칭MID Analysis, Militarized Dispute Coding, Correlates of War Dispute Analysis, Dyadic Conflict Onset AnalysisPower Transition Theory Analysis, Power Parity and War Analysis, Hegemonic Transition Analysis, Overtaking and War Analysis
관련33
요약Militarized interstate dispute (MID) analysis is the coding and quantitative study of confrontations in which one state threatens, displays, or uses military force against another. Built on the Correlates of War project's MID dataset and the coding rules codified by Jones, Bremer, and Singer (1996), it provides the standard observational measure of interstate conflict short of and including war, structured as dyad-years so that the onset, escalation, and outcomes of disputes can be modeled statistically across two centuries of the international system.Power transition analysis examines when and why war breaks out between a dominant state and a rising challenger as their relative power converges. Originating in A. F. K. Organski and Jacek Kugler's The War Ledger (1980), it holds that the international system is hierarchical and most dangerous not at moments of clear preponderance but when a dissatisfied rising power approaches parity with the dominant state — and it operationalizes this by tracking relative national capabilities over time and relating overtaking to the onset of major war.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis · Power Transition Analysis. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare