ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

메타분석 코호트 연구×용량-반응 메타분석×
분야역학근거 합성
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1980s–1990s (formalized practice)1992
창시자Developed iteratively through epidemiological meta-analysis literature; Greenland, Berlin, Colditz among key contributorsGreenland & Longnecker (1992), Advanced by Orsini et al. (2012)
유형Quantitative synthesis / observational epidemiologyMethod
원전Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 135(11), 1301-1309. DOI ↗Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992). Methods for trend estimation of environmental health risks, with application to exposure to contaminated groundwater. Statistics in Medicine, 11(14‐15), 1837–1847. link ↗
별칭cohort meta-analysis, pooled cohort analysis, meta-analysis of cohort studies, prospective cohort meta-analysisDose-Response Relationship, Non-Linear Meta-Analysis, Dose-Effect Synthesis
관련21
요약A meta-analytic cohort study systematically identifies, appraises, and statistically pools the findings of two or more independent cohort studies addressing the same exposure-outcome relationship. By combining large prospective datasets, it provides more precise risk estimates than any single cohort alone, makes dose-response patterns detectable, and enables subgroup analyses across diverse populations. It is the design of choice when cohort-level evidence exists but individual studies are underpowered or inconsistent.Dose-response meta-analysis is a specialized evidence synthesis method that models the relationship between exposure dose (or intensity, duration, quantity) and health outcome across multiple studies, assessing whether effects follow a linear trend, nonlinear curve, or threshold pattern. Pioneered by Greenland and Longnecker (1992) and refined by Orsini et al. (2012), dose-response meta-analysis answers critical questions like 'Does cardiovascular disease risk increase consistently with salt intake, or is there a threshold above which risk plateaus?' and 'Does the benefit of physical activity increase linearly with exercise duration, or do diminishing returns occur at high doses?' This method is essential for risk assessment, policy-setting on safe exposure limits, and optimizing treatment dosing.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Meta-analytic Cohort Study · Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare