ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

메타분석적 환자-대조군 연구×전향적 환자-대조군 연구×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1980s–2000 (formalized with MOOSE reporting guidelines in 2000)1970s–1990s (formalized alongside nested case-control methods)
창시자Systematic development attributed to multiple epidemiologists; MOOSE guidelines formalized by Stroup et al.Evolved from classical retrospective case-control methodology; prospective embedding attributed to modern epidemiological practice (Rothman, Greenland, and others, late 20th century)
유형Observational study synthesisObservational analytic study design
원전Shapiro, S. (1994). Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 140(9), 771-778. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
별칭pooled case-control analysis, case-control meta-analysis, meta-analytic case-control design, systematic pooled case-controlprospective case-control design, ambidirectional case-control, bidirectional case-control, nested case-control (prospective variant)
관련46
요약A meta-analytic case-control study systematically identifies, critically appraises, and quantitatively synthesizes data from multiple independent case-control studies examining the same exposure-disease relationship. By pooling odds ratios across studies, it yields a more precise and generalizable estimate of association than any single study can provide, while formally quantifying heterogeneity across populations, settings, and study periods.A prospective case-control study embeds the case-control logic within a defined cohort followed forward in time. Cases are identified as they occur, rather than looked up in records after the fact, and controls are sampled from the same prospectively monitored base population. This forward-looking approach allows collection of exposure data before outcome ascertainment, reducing recall bias — the principal weakness of the classic retrospective case-control design — while retaining the efficiency gains of sampling controls rather than enrolling a full cohort.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Meta-analytic case-control study · Prospective Case-Control Study. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare