방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 메타분석적 환자-대조군 연구× | 짝짓기 환자-대조군 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 역학 | 역학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1980s–2000 (formalized with MOOSE reporting guidelines in 2000) | 1950s–1970s |
| 창시자≠ | Systematic development attributed to multiple epidemiologists; MOOSE guidelines formalized by Stroup et al. | Brian MacMahon and others; systematised by Schlesselman (1982) |
| 유형≠ | Observational study synthesis | Observational analytic design |
| 원전≠ | Shapiro, S. (1994). Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 140(9), 771-778. DOI ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755474 |
| 별칭 | pooled case-control analysis, case-control meta-analysis, meta-analytic case-control design, systematic pooled case-control | matched case-referent study, individually matched case-control, pair-matched case-control, matched case-control design |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | A meta-analytic case-control study systematically identifies, critically appraises, and quantitatively synthesizes data from multiple independent case-control studies examining the same exposure-disease relationship. By pooling odds ratios across studies, it yields a more precise and generalizable estimate of association than any single study can provide, while formally quantifying heterogeneity across populations, settings, and study periods. | A matched case-control study is an observational epidemiological design in which each case (a person with the disease or outcome of interest) is paired with one or more controls (persons without the outcome) who share one or more characteristics — such as age, sex, or clinical setting — to control confounding. Exposure history is then compared between cases and their matched controls to estimate the odds ratio of the exposure-disease association. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|