방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 매칭된 생태학적 연구× | 짝짓기 환자-대조군 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 역학 | 역학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1970s–1990s (methodological consolidation) | 1950s–1970s |
| 창시자≠ | Extension of classical ecological study design; matching principles formalized in 20th-century epidemiology | Brian MacMahon and others; systematised by Schlesselman (1982) |
| 유형≠ | Observational study design | Observational analytic design |
| 원전≠ | Morgenstern, H. (1998). Ecologic studies in epidemiology: Concepts, principles, and methods. Annual Review of Public Health, 16, 61–81. link ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755474 |
| 별칭 | matched ecologic study, geographically matched ecological study, area-matched ecological design, matched aggregate study | matched case-referent study, individually matched case-control, pair-matched case-control, matched case-control design |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | A matched ecological study is an observational epidemiological design in which aggregate units — such as geographic areas, communities, or time periods — are systematically paired or matched on key characteristics before comparing exposure and outcome rates. Matching at the group level controls for area-level confounders and improves comparability between exposed and unexposed units, producing more credible estimates of ecological associations than an unmatched counterpart. | A matched case-control study is an observational epidemiological design in which each case (a person with the disease or outcome of interest) is paired with one or more controls (persons without the outcome) who share one or more characteristics — such as age, sex, or clinical setting — to control confounding. Exposure history is then compared between cases and their matched controls to estimate the odds ratio of the exposure-disease association. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|