ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study×횡단면 역학 연구×
분야역학역학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도Mid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
창시자Developed within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsClassical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
유형Observational epidemiological study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
원전Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
별칭matched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
관련56
요약A matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare