ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Manifesto Coding×Ideal Point Estimation×
분야Political SciencePolitical Science
계열Process / pipelineLatent structure
기원 연도20012004
창시자Manifesto Research Group / Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR)Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
유형Quantitative content analysis of party manifestosLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
원전Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., & Tanenbaum, E. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199244003Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
별칭CMP coding, MARPOR coding, Manifesto content analysis, Party manifesto codingIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
관련44
요약Manifesto coding is the quantitative content-analysis methodology of the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP/MARPOR) for measuring parties' policy preferences from their election manifestos. Trained coders break each manifesto into quasi-sentences and assign every unit to one of a fixed set of policy categories. Counting how often each category appears yields salience measures, and combining pro- and anti- categories produces position scores such as the left–right RILE index, giving comparable estimates of party positions across more than fifty democracies since 1945.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Manifesto Coding · Ideal Point Estimation. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare