ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

기계 학습 증강 성향 점수 매칭×Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도20042011-2012
창시자McCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Iacus, King, & Porro
유형Causal inference / matchingMatching / causal inference
원전McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
별칭ML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
관련66
요약Machine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Coarsened Exact Matching. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare