방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 종단적 수렴 타당도× | 종단 판별 타당도× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1997–2003 | 1993–2000 |
| 창시자≠ | Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise | Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993) |
| 유형≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity assessment / measurement quality |
| 원전≠ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity | LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validity |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time. | Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|