방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 종단 내용 분석× | 담화 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 질적 방법 | 질적 연구 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | Mid-20th century onward; systematized alongside content analysis (Berelson, 1952; Krippendorff, 1980) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 창시자≠ | Developed within the content analysis tradition; longitudinal extensions widely applied since the mid-20th century in communication and political science research | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative and mixed-methods research design | Method |
| 원전≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | LCA, repeated content analysis, diachronic content analysis, trend content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 요약≠ | Longitudinal Content Analysis (LCA) applies systematic content analysis to documents, media, or texts sampled at two or more time points in order to detect how themes, frames, language, or discourse patterns change or persist over time. Drawing on the established logic of content analysis, it adds a temporal dimension that allows researchers to chart trends, trace the evolution of representations, and test hypotheses about historical or social change. It is widely used in communication research, political science, media studies, and the health sciences. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|