ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Learning Progressions Analysis×Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling×
분야EducationEducation
계열Process / pipelineLatent structure
기원 연도20092010
창시자Science and mathematics education research (Corcoran, Mosher, Rogat; Wilson; Clements & Sarama)Tatsuoka; DiBello, Roussos & Stout; Junker & Sijtsma; de la Torre
유형Empirically grounded ordered description of how understanding develops over timeRestricted latent class models for diagnosing mastery of discrete skills
원전Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform (CPRE Research Report RR-63). Consortium for Policy Research in Education. link ↗Rupp, A. A., Templin, J., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Guilford Press. ISBN: 9781606235270
별칭Learning Trajectories, Progress Variables, Learning Progression Validation, Construct MapsCDM, Diagnostic Classification Models, DCM, DINA / G-DINA Models
관련44
요약Learning progressions analysis is a methodology for describing and validating the typical paths by which students' understanding of a core concept grows more sophisticated over time. A learning progression hypothesizes an ordered sequence of increasingly advanced ways of thinking — from naive ideas to expert understanding — and then tests that ordering against evidence of how students actually reason. Prominent in science and mathematics education, it links a theory of the domain, the design of assessment tasks, and a measurement model into a coherent description of conceptual development.Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs), also called diagnostic classification models, are restricted latent class models that report not a single ability score but a profile of which discrete skills or attributes a student has mastered. Each item is linked to the attributes it requires through a Q-matrix, and the model classifies every examinee into one of the possible binary mastery patterns. CDMs answer 'which specific skills does this student lack' rather than 'how much overall ability does this student have,' making them central to fine-grained diagnostic and formative assessment.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Learning Progressions Analysis · Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare