방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 내부 통제 평가× | 계속기업 평가× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 회계학 | 회계학 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1992 | 1988 |
| 창시자≠ | The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) |
| 유형≠ | Comprehensive control evaluation framework | Audit assessment and reporting framework |
| 원전≠ | The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. COSO Publications. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | COSO Framework, Control Design Testing, Internal Control Assessment | Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity Evaluation |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 3 |
| 요약≠ | Internal Control Evaluation is a systematic methodology for assessing the design and effectiveness of an entity's internal control system using the COSO Integrated Framework. Developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, this approach evaluates five interrelated components—control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring—to determine whether controls are adequate to prevent and detect errors and fraud. | Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|