ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Ideal Point Estimation×Roll-Call Analysis×
분야Political SciencePolitical Science
계열Latent structureLatent structure
기원 연도2004
창시자Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)Spatial-voting tradition; Poole, Rosenthal, Clinton, Jackman, Rivers
유형Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice dataScaling and analysis of legislative binary-choice data
원전Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗Poole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237. link ↗
별칭Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal pointsRoll call voting analysis, Legislative vote scaling, Roll-call scaling, Optimal classification of votes
관련43
요약Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.Roll-call analysis is the study of recorded legislative votes to recover the structure of political conflict — the ideological positions of legislators, the dimensionality of the issue space, and the cohesion of parties. It encompasses parametric spatial and item-response models that estimate latent ideal points, nonparametric scaling such as optimal classification that maximizes correctly classified votes without distributional assumptions, and descriptive cohesion statistics like the Rice index. Together these tools turn a matrix of yea/nay votes into a map of who agrees with whom and why.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Ideal Point Estimation · Roll-Call Analysis. 2026-06-24에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare