방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 계층적 확증 연구× | 확증적 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구설계 | 연구설계 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1980s–2000s | 1934 (Popper); widely adopted in social sciences from 1960s onward |
| 창시자≠ | Raudenbush & Bryk; Hox; Goldstein | Karl Popper (falsificationism); formalized in behavioral sciences by Paul Meehl and others |
| 유형≠ | Quantitative confirmatory research design | Quantitative research design |
| 원전≠ | Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761919049 | Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson. ISBN: 978-0415278447 |
| 별칭 | multilevel confirmatory research, nested confirmatory design, hierarchical hypothesis-testing research, HCR | hypothesis-testing research, deductive research, theory-testing research, confirmatory study |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Hierarchical confirmatory research is a quantitative design that tests pre-specified hypotheses about relationships or group differences in data that have a natural nested (hierarchical) structure — such as students clustered within classrooms, patients within hospitals, or employees within organizations. By explicitly modeling the hierarchy, it avoids the inflation of Type I error that occurs when nested data are analyzed as though observations were independent. | Confirmatory research is a deductive quantitative design in which the researcher specifies hypotheses derived from existing theory before data collection, then tests whether the data support or refute those hypotheses. Unlike exploratory approaches that generate ideas from data, confirmatory research begins with an established theoretical framework, pre-registers predictions, and applies statistical tests to evaluate those predictions against empirical evidence. It is the backbone of hypothesis-driven social, behavioral, and health science inquiry. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|