ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

망설이는 퍼지 EDAS (평균 해법으로부터의 거리 기반 평가)×계층 분석 과정×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20181980
창시자Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space)Saaty, T. L.
유형Hesitant outranking/ranking — Triangular Fuzzy Hesitant Fuzzy Set (TFHFS, Yu 2014): each cell is a finite set of triangular fuzzy numbers in [0,1]^3Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)
원전Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C., Civan, H. N. (2018). A novel hesitant fuzzy EDAS method and its application to hospital selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713
별칭
관련88
요약HF-EDAS (Hesitant Fuzzy EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kutlu Gündoğdu, F.; Kahraman, C.; Civan, H. (HF-EDAS); Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M. et al. 2015 (base EDAS); Yu, D. 2014 (TFHFS value-space) in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: HF-EDAS · AHP. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare