ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

이질적 처리 효과 매칭 추정량×Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도1997-20062011-2012
창시자Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & ImbensIacus, King, & Porro
유형Causal inference / nonparametric matchingMatching / causal inference
원전Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
별칭HTE matching, subgroup matching estimator, conditional matching estimator, CATE matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
관련66
요약The Heterogeneous Treatment Effect (HTE) Matching Estimator extends standard matching to recover how treatment impacts differ across subgroups or covariate values. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it pairs treated and control units on observed characteristics and then estimates the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) as a function of those characteristics — revealing who benefits most, least, or not at all.Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Matching Estimator · Coarsened Exact Matching. 2026-06-20에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare