방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 이질적 처리 효과 역확률 가중치 (HTE-IPW)× | 성향 점수 가중치 (PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 인과추론 | 인과추론 |
| 계열 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2003–2015 | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| 창시자≠ | Hirano, Imbens & Ridder; further developed by Abrevaya, Hsu & Lieli | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| 유형≠ | Causal inference / weighted regression | Causal inference / reweighting |
| 원전≠ | Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | HTE-IPW, CATE-IPW, heterogeneous IPW, conditional effect IPW | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| 관련≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | HTE-IPW extends standard inverse probability weighting to recover how causal effects vary across subgroups or covariate values. By reweighting each observation by the inverse of its estimated treatment probability, the method creates a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of background characteristics, and then estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) as a function of those characteristics. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|