ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

좋은 죽음 척도×영적 안녕 척도×
분야완화의료완화의료
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20091982
창시자Ching and colleagues, Hong KongRaymond F. Paloutzian and Craig W. Ellison
유형Self-report or proxy (bereaved family)Self-report
원전Ching, J. P., Cheng, Z. H., Cheung, K. C., & Leung, K. K. (2009). Development and validation of the Good Death Inventory in Hong Kong. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 26(1), 56–64. link ↗Paloutzian, R. F., & Ellison, C. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and the quality of life. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). Wiley. link ↗
별칭GDI, Good DeathSWBS
관련55
요약The Good Death Inventory (GDI) is a 20-item self-report measure assessing the patient's and family's perception of whether the death was 'good'—characterized by pain control, peace, meaningful closure, preparation, maintenance of dignity, and a sense that life was lived fully. Developed by Ching and colleagues in Hong Kong in 2009, the GDI operationalizes the multidimensional concept of a 'good death' into measurable dimensions, enabling clinicians and researchers to understand what makes end-of-life care meaningful and to identify deaths marked by distress or unfinished business.The Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS) is a 20-item self-report measure of spiritual well-being encompassing both religious faith and existential meaning—two dimensions critical to quality of life at end-of-life. Developed by Paloutzian and Ellison in 1982, the SWBS has become a cornerstone assessment tool in palliative care, chaplaincy, and oncology to identify unmet spiritual needs, guide supportive interventions, and evaluate the impact of spiritual care programs on patient outcomes.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Good Death Inventory · Spiritual Well-Being Scale. 2026-06-20에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare