ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

계속기업 평가×감사에서의 분석 절차×
분야회계학회계학
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도19881983
창시자American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
유형Audit assessment and reporting frameworkAudit procedure methodology
원전American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
별칭Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
관련34
요약Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Going Concern Evaluation · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare