방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 일반화가능성 이론 (G-Theory)× | 문항 반응 이론 (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1963–1972 | 1952–1968 |
| 창시자≠ | Lee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| 유형≠ | Variance-components reliability model | Probabilistic measurement model |
| 원전≠ | Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗ | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| 별칭≠ | G-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| 관련≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|