방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 퍼지 AHP× | 가중 이상 해법점수× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의사결정 | 의사결정 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1983 | 2020 |
| 창시자≠ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. | Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D. |
| 유형≠ | Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based | Ideal solution proximity (four score components) |
| 원전≠ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ | Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | — | — |
| 관련 | 8 | 8 |
| 요약≠ | FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | WISP (Weighted Ideal Solution Point) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., Pamučar, D. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|