ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

사기 위험 평가×감사에서의 분석 절차×
분야회계학회계학
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20021983
창시자American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
유형Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure frameworkAudit procedure methodology
원전American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
별칭Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud AssessmentAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
관련44
요약Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Fraud Risk Assessment · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare