방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 현장 지도 메타 민족지학 (Field-Mapping Meta-Ethnography)× | 스코핑 리뷰× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 과학계량학 | 과학계량학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1988 (meta-ethnography); field-mapping application 2000s–2010s | 2005 |
| 창시자≠ | Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography base); field-mapping frame developed in review methodology literature | Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative evidence synthesis with field-mapping scope | Evidence synthesis review design |
| 원전≠ | Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930599 | Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | field-mapping qualitative synthesis, scoping meta-ethnography, field-mapping qualitative meta-synthesis, landscape meta-ethnography | scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Field-mapping meta-ethnography combines the breadth of a field-mapping (scoping) review with the interpretive synthesis power of meta-ethnography. It first maps the full landscape of qualitative studies on a topic to understand what has been studied and how, then applies Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnographic synthesis to generate second-order and third-order constructs that represent the accumulated qualitative evidence across that field. | A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|