ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

현장 지도 메타 민족지학 (Field-Mapping Meta-Ethnography)×질적 메타종합×
분야과학계량학근거 합성
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1988 (meta-ethnography); field-mapping application 2000s–2010s2007
창시자Noblit & Hare (meta-ethnography base); field-mapping frame developed in review methodology literatureSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
유형Qualitative evidence synthesis with field-mapping scopeFramework
원전Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930599Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
별칭field-mapping qualitative synthesis, scoping meta-ethnography, field-mapping qualitative meta-synthesis, landscape meta-ethnographyQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
관련62
요약Field-mapping meta-ethnography combines the breadth of a field-mapping (scoping) review with the interpretive synthesis power of meta-ethnography. It first maps the full landscape of qualitative studies on a topic to understand what has been studied and how, then applies Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnographic synthesis to generate second-order and third-order constructs that represent the accumulated qualitative evidence across that field.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Field-mapping Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare