ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Field Experiment in Politics×Natural Experiment in Politics×
분야Political SciencePolitical Science
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20002012
창시자Gerber & Green (modern political field experiments)Dunning (design-based framework); Lee (close-election RD lineage)
유형Randomized experiment conducted in a real political settingObservational study exploiting as-if random assignment
원전Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 653–663. DOI ↗Dunning, T. (2012). Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107698000
별칭Political field experiment, Get-out-the-vote experiment, GOTV experiment, Voter mobilization experimentPolitical natural experiment, As-if random design, Design-based natural experiment, Quasi-experiment with as-if randomization
관련44
요약A field experiment in political science randomizes a real intervention — such as a get-out-the-vote canvass, mailing, or phone call — among genuine political actors in their natural environment and compares behavioral outcomes like validated turnout. Revived for the discipline by Gerber and Green's 2000 voter-mobilization study and codified in their 2012 textbook, the approach combines the causal leverage of randomization with the realism of consequential, real-world settings, while carefully distinguishing the effect of being assigned a treatment from the effect of actually receiving it.A natural experiment in political science exploits a naturally occurring source of as-if random assignment — close elections, lotteries, arbitrary boundaries, or policy thresholds — to identify causal effects without the researcher manipulating anything. Codified for the social sciences by Thad Dunning's 2012 design-based treatment and exemplified by David Lee's close-election regression-discontinuity analysis of U.S. House races, the approach treats nature, institutions, or chance as if they had run an experiment, recovering credible causal estimates from observational data when randomization is impossible.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Field Experiment in Politics · Natural Experiment in Politics. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare