ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

현장 기반 일탈 사례 표본 추출×의도적 표본 추출×
분야조사방법론조사방법론
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1980s–1990s (purposive/deviant case sampling literature)Formalized ~1980–1990
창시자Michael Quinn Patton; Yvonna Lincoln & Egon GubaMichael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
유형Purposive qualitative sampling strategyNon-probability sampling strategy
원전Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
별칭field deviant case sampling, outlier case sampling in field research, extreme case sampling in fieldwork, in-situ deviant case samplingjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
관련54
요약Field-based deviant case sampling is a purposive strategy that deliberately selects cases deviating markedly from an established pattern or norm, with data collected through direct fieldwork — observation, in-situ interviews, and ethnographic engagement — in the participants' natural settings. By studying outliers on-site, researchers gain contextually grounded insight into why and how certain cases diverge from the typical pattern.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Field-based Deviant Case Sampling · Purposive sampling. 2026-06-15에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare