ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

극단값 이론 (Extreme Value Theory, EVT)×ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) 모형×조건부 위험값(Expected Shortfall)×
분야재무학계량경제학재무학
계열Regression modelRegression modelRegression model
기원 연도200120152000
창시자Coles (textbook treatment); McNeil, Frey & EmbrechtsBox & Jenkins (Box-Jenkins methodology)Rockafellar & Uryasev (2000); Acerbi & Tasche (2002)
유형Tail / extreme-event modelUnivariate time-series modelCoherent tail-risk measure
원전Coles, S. (2001). An Introduction to Statistical Modeling of Extreme Values. Springer. ISBN: 978-1852334598Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C. & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118675021Rockafellar, R. T. & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21-41. DOI ↗
별칭EVT, generalized extreme value, generalized Pareto distribution, peaks over thresholdBox-Jenkins model, ARIMA(p,d,q), ARIMA ModeliCVaR, expected shortfall, average value-at-risk, tail VaR
관련555
요약Extreme Value Theory is a statistical framework for modelling the rare events that live in the tail of a probability distribution. As developed in Coles (2001) and applied to risk by McNeil, Frey & Embrechts (2005), it offers two standard routes: the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution for block maxima and the Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD), used in the peaks-over-threshold approach, for exceedances above a high threshold.ARIMA is a univariate time-series forecasting model that combines autoregressive, integrated (differencing), and moving-average components to predict a single continuous series from its own past. It is the centrepiece of the Box-Jenkins methodology set out in Box, Jenkins, Reinsel & Ljung's Time Series Analysis (5th ed., 2015).Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), also called Expected Shortfall, is a coherent tail-risk measure that quantifies the conditional expectation of losses beyond the Value-at-Risk threshold. It was introduced for optimization by Rockafellar and Uryasev (2000) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002), and it has replaced VaR as the regulatory standard under Basel III/IV.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Extreme Value Theory · ARIMA · Conditional Value-at-Risk. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare