방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 평등 가중 실용 혼합 방법 설계× | 질적 우선순위 혼합 연구 설계× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구설계 | 연구설계 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| 창시자≠ | Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars) | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 유형 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 원전 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 별칭 | equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|