ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Endorsement Experiment×Audit Experiment×
분야Political SciencePolitical Science
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도20112011
창시자Bullock, Imai & Shapiro (statistical framework)Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)
유형Indirect survey experiment for sensitive latent supportRandomized field experiment using matched fictitious requests
원전Bullock, W., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2011). Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis, 19(4), 363–384. DOI ↗Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗
별칭Endorsement question design, Endorsement experiment design, Indirect support measurement, Group-endorsement experimentCorrespondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness audit
관련44
요약An endorsement experiment indirectly measures latent support for a sensitive or stigmatized actor by randomizing whether a policy is attributed to that actor and comparing how respondents' support for the policy shifts. Formalized statistically by Bullock, Imai, and Shapiro in 2011 to measure support for militant groups in Pakistan, the design infers favorability toward an actor that respondents would not safely disclose directly from the change in policy support it induces, typically estimated with hierarchical item-response models.An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Endorsement Experiment · Audit Experiment. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare