방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Emotion Appraisal in Politics× | Issue Framing Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 정치심리학 | 정치심리학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2000 | 1997 |
| 창시자≠ | George Marcus, Russell Neuman & Michael MacKuen; Ted Brader | Thomas Nelson; Dennis Chong & James Druckman |
| 유형 | Survey/lab experiment | Survey/lab experiment |
| 원전≠ | Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226504698 | Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567-583. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | Affective Intelligence Experiment, Political Emotion Appraisal Study, Discrete Emotions Politics Measure | Framing Effects Experiment, Emphasis Framing Study, Equivalence Framing Experiment |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Emotion appraisal in politics studies how distinct emotions, anxiety, anger, enthusiasm, and others, arise from cognitive appraisals of political events and in turn shape attention, information seeking, persuasion, and participation. It combines appraisal theory with affective intelligence theory (Marcus, Neuman and MacKuen, 2000) and Brader's (2006) work on emotional campaign appeals, typically measured through experiments and surveys that elicit and analyze discrete emotional responses. | An issue framing experiment manipulates how a political issue is described, emphasizing different considerations, to test how framing shifts opinion. Nelson, Clawson and Oxley's (1997) classic study showed that framing a Klan rally as a free-speech issue versus a public-order issue changed tolerance judgments, and Chong and Druckman (2007) systematized framing theory and the experimental methods used to estimate framing effects. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|