ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)×암 치료 기능 평가-일반 (FACT-G)×
분야종양간호학종양간호학
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19911993
창시자Eduardo BrueraDavid Cella
유형Patient self-report multisymptom palliative care scalePatient self-report questionnaire
원전Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care, 7(2), 6–9. DOI ↗Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., et al. (1993). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of a general measure. J Clin Oncol, 11(3), 570–579. DOI ↗
별칭ESAS, Edmonton Symptom Assessment ScaleFACT-General
관련44
요약The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a rapid, validated 9-item tool that assesses the severity of common symptoms in cancer and palliative care patients: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite loss, general well-being, and shortness of breath. Developed by Bruera and colleagues at the University of Alberta in 1991, the ESAS has become the standard symptom-screening instrument in oncology clinics, palliative care units, and end-of-life care settings worldwide, enabling efficient symptom prioritization and management escalation.The FACT-G is a 27-item self-report questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life in cancer patients across four key domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Developed by Cella et al. in 1993, it has become one of the most widely used generic QoL instruments in oncology research and clinical practice, translated into 40+ languages and validated across diverse cancer populations.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: ESAS · FACT-G. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare