ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

E-I Index×Dyadic Analysis×Homophily Analysis×
분야SociologySociologySociology
계열Process / pipelineRegression modelProcess / pipeline
기원 연도198819811954 (concept); 2001 (synthesis)
창시자David Krackhardt & Robert SternHolland & Leinhardt (p1); Kenny (Social Relations Model)Lazarsfeld & Merton (concept); McPherson, Smith-Lovin & Cook (synthesis)
유형Index of the relative balance of between-group versus within-group tiesAnalysis of the dyad as the unit, decomposing relational effectsMeasurement of similarity-based tie formation
원전Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140. DOI ↗Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 33–50. DOI ↗McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. DOI ↗
별칭EI index, external-internal index, Krackhardt-Stern E-I ratio, E/I ratiodyad analysis, dyadic data analysis, social relations model, dyad censushomophily measurement, assortative mixing analysis, birds-of-a-feather analysis, tie-similarity analysis
관련544
요약The external-internal (E-I) index, introduced by Krackhardt and Stern, measures the extent to which the ties of a group point outward to other groups versus inward to its own members. It is the number of between-group (external) ties minus the number of within-group (internal) ties, divided by the total number of ties. Ranging from −1 (all ties internal, perfect insularity) to +1 (all ties external), it is a compact summary of homophily and group closure that can be computed for a whole network, for each group, or for each node.Dyadic analysis treats the dyad — the pair of actors and the relation between them — as the unit of analysis, separating the relational outcome into what each actor brings to all their relationships and what is unique to the specific pair. It spans the descriptive dyad census of network analysis and statistical frameworks such as Holland and Leinhardt's p1 model and Kenny's Social Relations Model, all of which respect the structural non-independence inherent in relational data.Homophily analysis quantifies the tendency of similar individuals to form ties — the principle that 'birds of a feather flock together'. It compares the rate at which people connect with others who share an attribute (race, gender, age, education, attitudes) against what would be expected by chance, distinguishing the homophily that arises merely from group sizes from the genuine, behavior-driven preference for similar others.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: E-I Index · Dyadic Analysis · Homophily Analysis. 2026-06-25에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare