ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

이중 눈가림 다중 기저선 설계×교차 무작위 대조 시험 (crossover RCT)×
분야실험설계실험설계
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도1968 (multiple baseline); double-blind extension applied from 1980s onward in clinical behavioral research1960s (Grizzle 1965 for statistical foundations); widely used in clinical research since the 1970s
창시자Multiple baseline: Baer, Wolf & Risley (1968); double-blind procedural extension adapted from clinical trial methodologyEarly formalized by statisticians including Bradford Hill and colleagues in clinical trials; theoretical framework developed by Grizzle (1965) and later Senn (2002)
유형Single-subject experimental design with blinded outcome assessmentExperimental within-subject design
원전Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496533
별칭DB-MBD, blinded multiple baseline design, masked multiple baseline design, double-blind MBDcrossover RCT, crossover trial, within-subject RCT, AB/BA crossover design
관련55
요약The double-blind multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design in which an intervention is introduced sequentially across two or more independent baselines — behaviors, individuals, or settings — while outcome assessors (and ideally participants) remain unaware of which baseline is currently in the intervention phase. The double-blind procedural overlay reduces measurement bias and demand characteristics, strengthening causal inference beyond what a standard multiple baseline design offers.A crossover randomized controlled trial (crossover RCT) is an experimental design in which each participant receives all study interventions in a randomized sequence, separated by a washout period. Because every participant serves as their own control, within-subject variability is eliminated from the treatment comparison, yielding greater statistical power per participant than a parallel-group RCT of equal size.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Double-blind Multiple Baseline Design · Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare