ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

문서 분석×NVivo와 ATLAS.ti: 질적 분석을 위한 소프트웨어×
분야질적 연구질적 연구
계열Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
기원 연도19201999
창시자Max Weber and Karl MannheimQSR International (NVivo) and Scientific Software-Citational (ATLAS.ti)
유형MethodTool
원전Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412903653
별칭documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival researchCAQDAS, QDA software, qualitative analysis software, NVivo
관련44
요약Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.NVivo and ATLAS.ti are Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) programs that facilitate coding, organizing, and analyzing qualitative data—including text (transcripts, documents), images, video, and audio. NVivo, developed by QSR International, is widely used in academic research and supports data organization, coding, memo-writing, retrieval, and analysis visualizations. ATLAS.ti, developed by Scientific Software-Citational, emphasizes hermeneutic interpretation and network visualization. Both tools were introduced in the late 1990s and have become standard across disciplines. CAQDAS is not analysis itself—the researcher must make analytical decisions—but rather augments human analysis by managing large data volumes, organizing codes systematically, tracking analysis decisions, and generating visualizations. These tools improve transparency and rigor in qualitative research.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 4 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Document Analysis · NVivo and ATLAS.ti for Qualitative Analysis. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare