방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Dictionary-Based Text Analysis× | LIWC Text Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | Communication | Communication |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2003 | 2001 |
| 창시자≠ | Lexicon tradition (Pennebaker LIWC; General Inquirer) | James W. Pennebaker and colleagues |
| 유형≠ | Word-count text measurement against predefined category dictionaries | Dictionary-based quantitative text analysis |
| 원전≠ | Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. DOI ↗ | Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | Lexicon-based text analysis, Word-count text analysis, Dictionary method for content analysis, Sözlük Tabanlı Metin Analizi | Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, LIWC dictionary analysis, Word-count text analysis, LIWC Metin Analizi |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Dictionary-based text analysis measures concepts in text by counting how often words belonging to predefined category lists — dictionaries — appear in each document. It is the workhorse lexicon method behind tools like LIWC and the General Inquirer, prized for its transparency and scalability: a category score is simply the share of a document's words that match the category's word list. | LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) is a dictionary-based text-analysis method that counts the proportion of words in a text falling into psychologically and linguistically meaningful categories — such as positive emotion, cognitive processing, social references, and function words like pronouns. Developed by James Pennebaker and colleagues, it has become a workhorse for quantifying the psychological and rhetorical character of communication at scale. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|