ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Dual Hesitant Fuzzy 확장 EDAS×기준 영향 측정 시스템×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20232025
창시자Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
유형Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
원전Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. (2023). EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision making with probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy information and its application to suppliers selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
별칭
관련88
요약DHF-EDAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ning, B., Lin, R., Wei, G., Chen, X. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: DHF-EDAS · CIMAS. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare