ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

이중 망설임 퍼지 COPRAS 확장×Analytic Network Process (피드백 및 상호 의존성을 포함한 AHP)×
분야의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDM
기원 연도20201996
창시자Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K.Saaty, T. L.
유형Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
원전Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K. (2020). Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-Complex Proportional Assessment Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS). Symmetry DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
별칭
관련88
요약DHF-COPRAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: DHF-COPRAS · ANP. 2026-06-17에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare