방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| Deterrence Analysis× | Routine Activity Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | Criminology | Criminology |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1968 | 1979 |
| 창시자≠ | Cesare Beccaria & Jeremy Bentham (classical); Gary Becker & Daniel Nagin (modern) | Lawrence E. Cohen & Marcus Felson |
| 유형≠ | Theory and empirical analysis of how punishment deters offending | Theoretical framework for explaining the occurrence of predatory crime |
| 원전≠ | Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century: A review of the evidence. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263. DOI ↗ | Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | Deterrence Theory, Certainty-Severity-Celerity Analysis, Perceptual Deterrence Analysis, Focused Deterrence Analysis | RAT, Routine Activities Approach, Crime Triangle Framework, Cohen-Felson Theory |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Deterrence analysis studies how the threat and imposition of legal punishment discourage crime. Rooted in classical criminology and formalized in Gary Becker's economic model, it distinguishes the certainty, severity, and celerity of punishment, separates perceived from objective sanction risk, and uses quasi-experimental and perceptual evidence — synthesized by Daniel Nagin — to test how much, and through what channels, punishment actually deters. | Routine activity theory explains predatory crime not by the supply of motivated offenders but by the everyday structure of legal activities that brings offenders, targets, and the absence of guardians together in space and time. Proposed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979, it argues that crime rates can rise even when offender motivation is constant, because changes in how people work, shop, and spend leisure time alter the opportunities for crime. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|