ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Cubic-TOPSIS×Analytic Network Process (피드백 및 상호 의존성을 포함한 AHP)×최선-최악법 (Best-Worst Method)×
분야의사결정의사결정의사결정
계열MCDMMCDMMCDM
기원 연도201819962015
창시자Garg, H., Kaur, G.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.
유형Cubic Intuitionistic Fuzzy ranking — CIFN = (IVIFN, IFN): interval membership/non-membership ⟨[ζL,ζU],[ϑL,ϑU]⟩ (IVIFS part) + point membership/non-membership ⟨ζ,ϑ⟩ (IFS part); extended TOPSIS with weighted generalised distanceWeight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
원전Garg, H., Kaur, G. (2018). Extended TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision-making problems under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Scientia Iranica E DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
별칭
관련888
요약CUBIC-TOPSIS (Cubic-TOPSIS — Cubic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Garg, H., Kaur, G. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: CUBIC-TOPSIS · ANP · BWM. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare