방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 컴퓨터화된 적응형 검사 크론바흐 알파× | 문항 반응 이론 (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 심리측정학 | 심리측정학 |
| 계열 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1984 | 1952–1968 |
| 창시자≠ | Adapted from Cronbach (1951); CAT reliability framing developed by Green, Bock, Humphreys, Linn & Reckase (1984) | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| 유형≠ | Reliability / internal consistency estimation | Probabilistic measurement model |
| 원전≠ | Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn, R. L., & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 347–360. DOI ↗ | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| 별칭 | CAT reliability estimation, adaptive test internal consistency, CAT coefficient alpha, reliability in CAT | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| 관련≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Cronbach's alpha applied to computerized adaptive test (CAT) data estimates internal consistency reliability under the special condition that different examinees receive different subsets of items. Because the classic formula assumes every respondent answers the same items, its direct application to CAT data violates core assumptions and typically underestimates or misrepresents true reliability, requiring careful adaptation or replacement with IRT-based reliability indices. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|