방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비교 반성적 주제 분석× | 비교 사례 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2006 (reflexive TA); comparative application formalised ~2019–2021 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 창시자≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 원전≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953406 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 별칭 | Comparative RTA, cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, comparative qualitative thematic comparison | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Comparative Reflexive Thematic Analysis (CRTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to data drawn from two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts, with the explicit goal of contrasting thematic patterns across those groups. The reflexive element means the analyst continuously interrogates how their own perspectives and positioning shape the themes they construct, while the comparative element directs attention to differences and similarities between data sets rather than seeking a single unified account. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|