방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비교 설명 연구× | 비교 사례 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 연구설계 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1843 (Mill); contemporary social-science formalisation 1971–1987 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 창시자≠ | John Stuart Mill (methods of agreement and difference, 1843); formalised in social science by Arend Lijphart and Charles Ragin | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 유형≠ | Observational explanatory research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 원전≠ | Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. ISBN: 978-0520063167 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 별칭 | comparative explanation, explanatory comparative design, cross-case explanatory research, comparative causal analysis | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Comparative explanatory research is an observational design that systematically examines two or more groups, nations, organisations, or time points in order to explain why differences in outcomes occur. Rather than merely describing variation, it seeks causal or contributing mechanisms by holding some conditions constant while contrasting others — drawing on Mill's classical methods of agreement and difference. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|