방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 비교 고전적 근거 이론× | 비교 사례 연구× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 질적 방법 | 질적 방법 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 창시자≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 유형≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 원전≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 별칭 | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|