방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 코호트 연구× | 무작위 임상시험 (RCT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 역학 | 역학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s) | 1948 (first rigorously conducted RCT — MRC streptomycin trial) |
| 창시자≠ | Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854) | Austin Bradford Hill; MRC Streptomycin Trial team |
| 유형≠ | Observational longitudinal study design | Interventional experimental study |
| 원전≠ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385 |
| 별칭 | longitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study | RCT, randomized controlled trial, randomised controlled trial, clinical randomized trial |
| 관련 | 6 | 6 |
| 요약≠ | A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome. | A randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study design in which participants are randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group, then followed prospectively to compare outcomes. Random allocation is the defining feature: it distributes known and unknown confounders across groups by chance, making the RCT the strongest individual study design for establishing causal efficacy of a treatment or intervention under controlled conditions. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|