ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM)×성향 점수 가중치 (PSW / IPW)×
분야인과추론인과추론
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도2011-20121983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
창시자Iacus, King, & PorroRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
유형Matching / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
원전Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
별칭CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
관련66
요약Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Coarsened Exact Matching · Propensity Score Weighting. 2026-06-19에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare