방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| CASP 무작위 대조 시험 체크리스트× | GRADE 근거 프로파일링: 근거의 확실성 및 권고 강도 평가× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 연구방법론 | 연구방법론 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1993 (updated through 2023) | 2008 |
| 창시자≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) |
| 유형≠ | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment | Research team / Guideline panel assessment |
| 원전≠ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | CASP-RCT, CASP | GRADE, GRADE approach |
| 관련 | 4 | 4 |
| 요약≠ | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|