ScholarGate
어시스턴트

방법 비교

선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.

부트스트랩 DEA: 효율성 점수에 대한 편향 보정 및 신뢰 구간×말퀴스트 생산성 지수(Malmquist Productivity Index)×
분야효율성 분석효율성 분석
계열Regression modelRegression model
기원 연도19981994
창시자Simar & WilsonFäre, Grosskopf, Norris & Zhang
유형Nonparametric efficiency estimation with bootstrap inferenceNon-parametric productivity index
원전Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. DOI ↗Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83. link ↗
별칭Bootstrapped DEA, DEA Bootstrap Inference, Simar-Wilson Bootstrap, Bootstrap Sınır AnaliziMPI, Malmquist Index, Malmquist DEA Productivity Index, Malmquist Verimlilik Endeksi
관련21
요약Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (Bootstrap DEA) is a resampling-based extension of standard DEA that provides statistically valid inference for efficiency scores. Introduced by Simar and Wilson in 1998, it addresses the core weakness of classical DEA — its inability to quantify uncertainty in estimated scores — by constructing bootstrap confidence intervals and bias-corrected efficiency estimates from repeatedly resampled pseudo-frontiers.The Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is a non-parametric measure of total factor productivity (TFP) change over time. Formally grounded in distance functions by Caves, Christensen, and Diewert (1982) and operationalized using Data Envelopment Analysis by Färe, Grosskopf, Norris, and Zhang (1994), MPI decomposes productivity growth into two components: efficiency change (catching-up to the frontier) and technical change (shift of the frontier itself).
ScholarGate데이터셋
  1. v1
  2. 1 출처
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 출처
  3. PUBLISHED

검색으로 이동 슬라이드 다운로드

ScholarGate방법 비교: Bootstrap DEA · Malmquist Productivity Index. 2026-06-18에 다음에서 검색함: https://scholargate.app/ko/compare