방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 계량서지 분석× | 공동 인용 분석× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야≠ | 과학계량학 | 계량서지학 |
| 계열 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 기원 연도≠ | 1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s | 1973 |
| 창시자≠ | Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934) | Henry Small |
| 유형≠ | Quantitative literature analysis | Method |
| 원전≠ | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis |
| 관련≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 요약≠ | Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline. | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|