방법 비교
선택한 방법을 나란히 검토하세요. 서로 다른 행은 강조 표시됩니다.
| 가법 비율 평가× | 퍼지 AHP× | |
|---|---|---|
| 분야 | 의사결정 | 의사결정 |
| 계열 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 기원 연도≠ | 2010 | 1983 |
| 창시자≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. |
| 유형≠ | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) | Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based |
| 원전≠ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ | Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗ |
| 별칭 | — | — |
| 관련 | 8 | 8 |
| 요약≠ | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate데이터셋 ↗ |
|
|